Comments on: Performance Test: isDefined x structKeyExists http://www.placona.co.uk/20/coldfusion/performance-test-isdefined-x-structkeyexists/ ColdFusion, Ruby and General Technology Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:51:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Marcos Placonahttp://www.placona.co.uk/20/coldfusion/performance-test-isdefined-x-structkeyexists/comment-page-1/#comment-457 Marcos Placona Fri, 30 Apr 2010 15:06:03 +0000 #comment-457 This test happens to have been done using CF7 at the time. I've modified the text slightly, so it makes it more clear. Thanks for pointing that out. This test happens to have been done using CF7 at the time. I’ve modified the text slightly, so it makes it more clear. Thanks for pointing that out.

]]> By: Ashleyhttp://www.placona.co.uk/20/coldfusion/performance-test-isdefined-x-structkeyexists/comment-page-1/#comment-456 Ashley Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:48:57 +0000 #comment-456 Can I ask why you think that "IsDefined" is quicker than "StructKeyExists". From my view of your chart, "isDefined" is approx 500ms, "StructKeyExists" takes around 50ms ... However, on my linux based CF8 server, "isDefined" takes 493ms, "StructKeyExists" takes 338ms ... Can I ask why you think that “IsDefined” is quicker than “StructKeyExists”. From my view of your chart, “isDefined” is approx 500ms, “StructKeyExists” takes around 50ms …

However, on my linux based CF8 server, “isDefined” takes 493ms, “StructKeyExists” takes 338ms …

]]> By: Mohamadhttp://www.placona.co.uk/20/coldfusion/performance-test-isdefined-x-structkeyexists/comment-page-1/#comment-23 Mohamad Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-23 Marcos, is there a reason to revise your test here? I'm asking since it's fairly old, and I'm not sure if anything has changed in the last couple of years. Marcos, is there a reason to revise your test here? I’m asking since it’s fairly old, and I’m not sure if anything has changed in the last couple of years.

]]> By: Martinhttp://www.placona.co.uk/20/coldfusion/performance-test-isdefined-x-structkeyexists/comment-page-1/#comment-21 Martin Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-21 Can I ask why you're using evaluate in your example? It's completely unnecessary. Can I ask why you’re using evaluate in your example? It’s completely unnecessary.

]]> By: Marcos Placonahttp://www.placona.co.uk/20/coldfusion/performance-test-isdefined-x-structkeyexists/comment-page-1/#comment-22 Marcos Placona Wed, 29 Nov 2006 23:00:00 +0000 #comment-22 Ok evaluate() removed. You're right, there's no need to use evaluate in this case. Ok evaluate() removed. You’re right, there’s no need to use evaluate in this case.

]]>