<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: ColdFusion 9 (AKA Centaur) to have impressive new features</title> <atom:link href="http://www.placona.co.uk/63/coldfusion/coldfusion-9-aka-centaur-to-have-impressive-new-features/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.placona.co.uk/63/coldfusion/coldfusion-9-aka-centaur-to-have-impressive-new-features/</link> <description>ColdFusion, Ruby and General Technology</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Marcos Placona</title><link>http://www.placona.co.uk/63/coldfusion/coldfusion-9-aka-centaur-to-have-impressive-new-features/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link> <dc:creator>Marcos Placona</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">#comment-67</guid> <description>@Russ Do you reckon Adobe hasn&#039;t done it properly then? Why so?
Cheers</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Russ Do you reckon Adobe hasn&#8217;t done it properly then? Why so?</p><p>Cheers</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Russ</title><link>http://www.placona.co.uk/63/coldfusion/coldfusion-9-aka-centaur-to-have-impressive-new-features/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link> <dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">#comment-68</guid> <description>Well at least Railo has done it properly.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well at least Railo has done it properly.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Marcos Placona</title><link>http://www.placona.co.uk/63/coldfusion/coldfusion-9-aka-centaur-to-have-impressive-new-features/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link> <dc:creator>Marcos Placona</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">#comment-64</guid> <description>I agree with you here Allen. It&#039;d be much easier if during &quot;compilation&quot;, the variables were set as private unless you specified. I&#039;ve had some massive headaches tinkering with this issue, and could never really get to a feasible solution. Band-aids is really the right term on this case.
Cheers</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you here Allen. It&#8217;d be much easier if during &quot;compilation&quot;, the variables were set as private unless you specified. I&#8217;ve had some massive headaches tinkering with this issue, and could never really get to a feasible solution. Band-aids is really the right term on this case.</p><p>Cheers</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Allen</title><link>http://www.placona.co.uk/63/coldfusion/coldfusion-9-aka-centaur-to-have-impressive-new-features/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link> <dc:creator>Allen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">#comment-63</guid> <description>LOCAL scope?  How much longer will this issue continue with band aids.  The problem with CF is that it defaults variables to the variables scope  which is by it&#039;s nature not private to the method it&#039;s being used in (if it&#039;s being used in a method).  Instead of throwing yet another band aid at is in the form of yet another scope, LOCAL, why not do something to address the core issue and assume that variables set in a method are private unless otherwise specified?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOCAL scope?  How much longer will this issue continue with band aids.  The problem with CF is that it defaults variables to the variables scope  which is by it&#8217;s nature not private to the method it&#8217;s being used in (if it&#8217;s being used in a method).  Instead of throwing yet another band aid at is in the form of yet another scope, LOCAL, why not do something to address the core issue and assume that variables set in a method are private unless otherwise specified?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tom Chiverton</title><link>http://www.placona.co.uk/63/coldfusion/coldfusion-9-aka-centaur-to-have-impressive-new-features/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link> <dc:creator>Tom Chiverton</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">#comment-66</guid> <description>Yes, given that we had the head of CF there, it&#039;s a shame that even in the BoF session it was still &#039;yes, we&#039;ll think about adding that&#039; when it turns out they probably already had it sloted in. So what was the point of &#039;what would you like in CF9&#039; again ?
I&#039;d also like to hear something from the CFML language board about all these new features. And OpenBD, who aren&#039;t on it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, given that we had the head of CF there, it&#8217;s a shame that even in the BoF session it was still &#8216;yes, we&#8217;ll think about adding that&#8217; when it turns out they probably already had it sloted in. So what was the point of &#8216;what would you like in CF9&#8242; again ?</p><p>I&#8217;d also like to hear something from the CFML language board about all these new features. And OpenBD, who aren&#8217;t on it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Simon Whatley</title><link>http://www.placona.co.uk/63/coldfusion/coldfusion-9-aka-centaur-to-have-impressive-new-features/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link> <dc:creator>Simon Whatley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">#comment-65</guid> <description>The comments coming out of CFUnited are very interesting. I&#039;m sure Andy Allan and Kev McCabe would liked to have some of the Centaur comments announced at Scotch earlier this month.
However, conference politics aside, there was also mention of &lt;cffinally&gt; and &lt;cfcontinue&gt; and server events via a Server.cfc (as a supplement to the Application.cfc events).
The CF team like to called Centaur the &quot;eagerly anticpated next release&quot; ... I certainly am eagerly anticipating it, although the CF9 developer exam is going to get even bigger as a consequence!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The comments coming out of CFUnited are very interesting. I&#8217;m sure Andy Allan and Kev McCabe would liked to have some of the Centaur comments announced at Scotch earlier this month.</p><p>However, conference politics aside, there was also mention of &lt;cffinally&gt; and &lt;cfcontinue&gt; and server events via a Server.cfc (as a supplement to the Application.cfc events).</p><p>The CF team like to called Centaur the &quot;eagerly anticpated next release&quot; &#8230; I certainly am eagerly anticipating it, although the CF9 developer exam is going to get even bigger as a consequence!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
